http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QT1Hy8y5leM
and the new dyno chart

Modérateur : Modérateurs
Thanks!!clement a écrit :niiiiiiiice!!!
Very pleased I love my new whip! Not what I expected but that's only because the plans changed last second. Over all I'm very happy with how things turned out!2pat a écrit :haha 400. good stuff dude!
Are you pleased? is this what you expected? you didn't mention if you were happy.
Thanks! I can't wait to put it on the track!Ricardo A a écrit :nice numbers !
now you need to see the true potential of your car.
put the car where it was meant to be ; the track. ASAP.
I will definitely try and make it!Yanos a écrit :agree! Sanair July 19th, be there!Ricardo A a écrit :nice numbers !
now you need to see the true potential of your car.
put the car where it was meant to be ; the track. ASAP.
You are absolutely right, every car is totally different and I liked them all very much! Except for the car stock. IT SUCKED. If I had to chose one setup to be the best I would chose the one with 361hp. It was nice all around, cheap and reliable!. BUT I would also have to chose my current setup as the funnest and most BADASS!!. Charts tell allot of the story but they definitely don't tell the entire one. The setup I have right now would kick the crap out of any of the setups I previously had. Yeah, the car has a little less power down low according to the charts, but according to my but...It doesn't think so! The car is just silly fast right now. Whenever you race or kick your car it's always above 3k anyway so power down low doesn't mean s*** in those circumstances. I always looked at the charts on big turbo setups and had the same thoughts as you. I like a car to have power right away and fast. That''s why I only went with the 20g and not a 30. But to tell you the truth all I could think about today is going with a bigger turbo...Turf Man a écrit :Impressive numbers.
If I'm correct, you began with stock (see page 5 of current thread):
pEngine/wheel: 284/201 @ 6445
Torque: 275 @ 3620
Torque at 4000rpm: approx 268
Torque at 3000rpm: approx 240
Then headers up-pipe + ecutech
pEngine/ wheel: 361/ 252 @ 6685
Torque: 345 @ 3985
Torque at 4000rpm: approx 342
Torque at 3000rpm: approx 240
And now:
pEngine/ wheel: 406/ 305 @ 6050
Torque: 387 @ 4980
Torque at 4000rpm: approx 290
Torque at 3000rpm: approx 195
These are 3 very different cars. On paper, you gained 45hp running 590rpm lower from the previous version. More HP, available sooner is a sure gain on a track. How do you like this new set up?
Is this on 94 octane?
il09sti a écrit :New on the wish list is the Cosworth Subaru EJ25 (2.5L) STI Performance Cylinder Heads.![]()
http://www.cosworth.com/default.aspx?id=1091911
Turf Man a écrit :il09sti a écrit :New on the wish list is the Cosworth Subaru EJ25 (2.5L) STI Performance Cylinder Heads.![]()
http://www.cosworth.com/default.aspx?id=1091911
Jesus... 10500rpm!
for how long does it need to crank to start?il09sti a écrit :I need some help or suggestions. If I temporarily shut down my car, then come back to a warm engine and try to start it, the engine cranks but has trouble starting. I have to either pump the gas a little or just crank and crank till it starts, neither of which I like to do. What do you think the problem is? Do you think it's a fuel pump problem? Injectors? spark plugs?... Any and all help/suggestions are welcome.